The second this week affirmed the rejection of a Mother's petition to modify support, which was filed stating that the current payor was not the father and should be released from his obligation…then they make clear that he is not prohibited from seeking any such relief…and cite to chapter 742…seems like paternity's already determined, and of course this is intrinsic fraud…so I guess they're telling him to set aside the original judgment and hope he's timely? See Hukill v. Shelton…
1 comment:
Why people still make use of to read news papers when in this technological world
the whole thing is existing on net?
Here is my weblog; cool pest control company names
Post a Comment